Planning may be slower, more complex and more demanding than ever, but Paul Fong believes the industry is asking the wrong question. In this conversation, he explains why successful planning is increasingly about strategy, leadership and building confidence long before an application reaches committee.
Author | Paul Skuse, Oakfield Design & Creation
Oakfield Property Insight
Part One of our conversation with Paul Fong, Founder of Morgan Elliot Planning.
Everyone Says Planning Is Broken.
Paul Fong Thinks We’re Asking the Wrong Question.
The phrase “the planning system is broken” has become almost commonplace within the development industry. Whether speaking to developers, landowners or architects, the frustration is rarely far from the surface. Delays continue to grow, planning applications appear increasingly complex and costs continue to rise long before a brick is ever laid.
Yet during a recent conversation with Paul Fong, Founder of Cheltenham-based Morgan Elliot Planning, it became clear that perhaps the industry’s biggest misconception isn’t that planning has become more difficult, but that we’re asking the wrong question altogether.
Rather than viewing planning as a bureaucratic process to navigate, Paul sees it as a strategic exercise in leadership. Success, he argues, is rarely determined by the planning application itself, but by everything that happens before it is submitted.
It was a fascinating conversation that challenged many of the assumptions developers have become accustomed to making.
Paul Skuse: Almost every developer I speak to tells me the planning system is broken. Do you agree?
Paul Fong, Founder, Morgan Elliot Planning:
I completely understand why developers feel that way because, viewed from their perspective, the planning system appears slower, more expensive and considerably more complicated than it did even a few years ago. Every application now requires more technical evidence, input from a wider range of specialist consultants and significantly more supporting documentation than many people would have expected in the past. All of that naturally increases both cost and timescales before a planning officer has even had the opportunity to assess the scheme.
Alongside that, local authorities are facing enormous pressures of their own. Many planning departments are carrying workloads that simply weren’t there a decade ago, experienced officers are becoming increasingly difficult to recruit and the resources available to determine complex applications often fall well short of what the industry would ideally like to see. When developers experience those delays first-hand, it’s entirely understandable that they conclude the system itself is broken.
Personally, though, I see it rather differently.
I don’t believe planning has become impossible. I believe it has become considerably more sophisticated and, because of that, our approach has to evolve alongside it. The system now demands a much higher standard of preparation, a much deeper understanding of the issues surrounding a site and a much more strategic way of thinking long before an application is ever submitted.
For us, everything begins with understanding our client’s objectives because unless we genuinely understand what they’re trying to achieve, it’s very difficult to guide them towards the best route to getting there. Once we understand those objectives, we take ownership of the project ourselves. We don’t simply become the planning consultant preparing reports, we become invested in delivering the development.
That then allows us to assemble the right consultant team around the project, bringing together the technical specialists required to produce a planning application that is both comprehensive and robust. Whether that’s ecology, highways, drainage, heritage or landscape, every discipline has to contribute towards a single strategy because once that technical foundation is in place, you have the ingredients required to move the application forwards with confidence.
The important point is that someone has to lead that process.
Submitting a planning application doesn’t mean the planning system suddenly takes ownership of it. The planning authority isn’t there to champion a development on behalf of a client and nor should it be. Our role is to lead the project all the way through the planning process, continually presenting the strongest possible case for why that development deserves support.
Paul: Listening to this, it sounds as though you’re describing far more than a traditional planning consultancy.
Paul Fong: I think that’s probably a fair observation because planning today involves much more than simply understanding planning policy.
One of the largest projects we’re currently promoting is a seventeen-hectare business park which, once delivered, will secure the long-term future of two major employers within the county. The economic benefits alone are substantial, bringing investment, employment and long-term business growth to the area, but if that’s the only story we tell then we’re not presenting the complete picture.
Naturally, local stakeholders will immediately look at the loss of Green Belt, the impact upon existing sports facilities, ecological considerations and the effect the development may have on the surrounding community. Those are perfectly legitimate questions and they deserve thoughtful answers rather than simply being viewed as obstacles to overcome.
Our responsibility is to demonstrate the wider public benefits that sit alongside the commercial objectives.
In this particular case, we’re not only creating employment space, we’re also delivering replacement sports pitches, a new clubhouse and a mobility hub which connects directly into the wider cycle network, making it easier for people to travel sustainably throughout the area. When you begin presenting the project in those broader terms, the conversation changes completely because people are no longer looking at a single planning application. They’re looking at the long-term future of an entire community.
Planning, at its best, should always be about balancing those interests.
Paul: So, the role is now one of both partnership and leadership?
Paul Fong: I think it has to be.
There’s an old saying within planning that planning officers make recommendations while politicians make decisions and, although that’s something of a simplification, there’s a great deal of truth in it. Once you understand that distinction, you also begin to understand where much of our work really lies.
Our responsibility isn’t to persuade people to support something they fundamentally disagree with. It’s to ensure that everyone involved has complete confidence that every issue has been considered, every stakeholder has been listened to and every opportunity to improve the scheme has been explored.
Sometimes that means explaining the wider economic benefits of a development. Sometimes it’s demonstrating how environmental impacts have been minimised. Sometimes it’s about improving community facilities that already exist. Every site is different, which means every planning strategy has to be different too.
Ultimately, we’re helping decision makers feel comfortable making what can sometimes be a very difficult decision.
That’s why we describe our approach as 360 Planning.
Everything begins with understanding the development itself before bringing together the right consultant team, creating technically robust evidence, engaging with stakeholders, understanding local political priorities and ensuring the proposal addresses the wider economic, environmental and social agenda surrounding the site.
When all of those elements work together, planning becomes far more than a collection of technical reports. It becomes a coherent strategy.
Paul: That philosophy feels quite different from simply responding to planning policy.
Paul Fong: It is different and, if I’m honest, it’s largely been shaped by experience.
Over the years we’ve learnt that adopting a confrontational approach rarely delivers the best outcomes. Planning has never really been about proving who’s right and who’s wrong. It’s about understanding the concerns that naturally exist around development and then demonstrating, honestly and transparently, how those concerns have been addressed.
Every development creates change and, understandably, people are often cautious about change, particularly when it’s close to where they live or work. Our job isn’t to dismiss those concerns. It’s to acknowledge them, understand them and then show how good planning can deliver something that leaves the wider community better than before.
When people can clearly see that a proposal has been carefully considered from every angle, confidence begins to replace uncertainty and that’s often where progress starts to happen.
For me, that’s one of the most rewarding aspects of planning because you’re not simply helping deliver buildings. You’re helping shape places that people will live, work and spend time in for decades to come.
As this first conversation drew to a close, one thing became abundantly clear. While many in the industry continue to debate whether the planning system is broken, Paul Fong is focused on something entirely different. His attention isn’t on the obstacles themselves, but on developing the strategy, leadership and collaboration required to navigate them successfully.
It’s an approach that feels less about processing planning applications and far more about building confidence, bringing people together and creating developments that can genuinely stand the test of time.
Next Week…
In the second part of our conversation with Paul Fong, we explore why community engagement often determines the success or failure of a development, why developers should involve planning consultants far earlier than many currently do and how Government reforms are beginning to reshape the planning landscape. Above all, we discuss why Paul believes the best planning outcomes are achieved not through confrontation, but through intelligent collaboration.
Continue the Conversation
If you’re assessing a development opportunity, considering the potential of a site or simply want to discuss how an early planning strategy could strengthen your next project, Paul Fong would be delighted to hear from you.
Paul Fong
Founder, Morgan Elliot Planning
LinkedIn: @PaulFong
Website: morganelliot.co.uk
Email: Paulfong@morganelliot.co.uk
Direct Dial: 07770 268650
Oakfield Property Insight is an editorial series exploring the people, ideas and strategies shaping residential and commercial development across the South West. Through conversations with leading developers, planners, architects, estate agents and industry specialists, we aim to share practical insight that helps landowners, developers and property professionals make better-informed decisions while creating places that will be enjoyed for generations to come.

